Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for...
Journal article

Complete vs culprit-only revascularization for patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease who undergo primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are most commonly treated with PCI to the culprit lesion only. Whether a strategy of complete revascularization in these patients is superior is unknown. We performed a meta-analysis comparing the benefits and risks of routine culprit-only PCI vs multivessel PCI in …

Authors

Bainey KR; Mehta SR; Lai T; Welsh RC

Journal

American Heart Journal, Vol. 167, No. 1, pp. 1–14.e2

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 2014

DOI

10.1016/j.ahj.2013.09.018

ISSN

0002-8703