Home
Scholarly Works
Olsalazine Versus Sulfasalazine in Mild to...
Journal article

Olsalazine Versus Sulfasalazine in Mild to Moderate Childhood Ulcerative Colitis

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of olsalazine sodium was compared to sulfasalazine over 3 months in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study of 56 children with mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Twenty-eight children received 30 mg/kg/day of olsalazine (maximum, 2 g/day) and 28 received 60 mg/kg/day of sulfasalazine (maximum, 4 g/day). Side effects were frequent in both groups. Eleven of 28 patients (39%) on olsalazine reported headache, nausea, vomiting, rash, pruritus, increased diarrhea, and/or fever. Thirteen of 28 on sulfasalazine (46%) reported similar side effects and/or neutropenia, and four patients had the drug stopped because of an adverse reaction. After 3 months, 11 of 28 (39%) on olsalazine were asymptomatic or clinically improved, compared to 22 of 28 (79%) on sulfasalazine (p = 0.006). In addition, 10 of 28 patients on olsalazine versus one on sulfasalazine required prednisone because of lack of response or worsening of colitis (p = 0.005). The dose of olsalazine used in this clinical trial was thought to be equivalent to a standard dose of sulfasalazine, but fewer patients on olsalazine improved and a greater number had progression of symptoms when compared to sulfasalazine. Although side effects were slightly less frequent for olsalazine, the number of patients was too small to detect a clinically significant difference.

Authors

Ferry GD; Kirschner BS; Grand RJ; Issenman RM; Griffiths AM; Vanderhoof JA; Fiedorek SC; Winter HS; Hassall EG; Watkins JB

Journal

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 32–38

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

January 1, 1993

DOI

10.1097/00005176-199307000-00005

ISSN

0277-2116
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team