Home
Scholarly Works
Cortical Evoked Responses Following Esophageal...
Journal article

Cortical Evoked Responses Following Esophageal Balloon Distension and Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Volunteers

Abstract

Recording of evoked potential responsesrepresents an objective and quantifiable method to studyvisceral afferent sensory pathways in humans. Weexamined the evoked responses to mechanical distension(balloon) and electrical stimulation of the proximal anddistal esophagus. A standard manometric catheter with alatex balloon and an additional electrode attached toits body was placed in the lower esophagus in 15 healthy young volunteers. Repeatednonpainful balloon distension stimuli above theindividual sensation threshold (0.17 Hz, 12-20 ml) orshort electrical impulses (0.2 Hz, 12-16 mA) weredelivered in an alternate fashion at 23 and 33 cm from thenares. Evoked potential responses (EP) were recordedthrough 22 scalp surface electrodes using the standard10/20 International EEG system of electrode placement. Balloon distension produced a reproducibletriphasic response at both sites. Peak latencies ofthree negative EP peaks were 92 ± 17, 229± 40, and 339 ± 36 msec with proximalstimulation versus 154 ± 24, 275 ± 24, and384 ± 30 msec obtained with distal stimulation (P< 0.001). Electrical stimulation produced a triphasicresponse with significantly shorter peak latencies atboth sites when compared to mechanical stimulation (P <0.001). Peak latencies were 74 ± 12, 137 ±11, and 245 ± 27 msec proximal versus 83 ±12, 148 ± 32, and 247 ± 51 msec withdistal stimulation (P < 0.01). The calculated conduction velocities forboth modes of stimulation (balloon: 1.73 ± 0.9m/sec vs electrical: 10.1 ± 3.4 m/sec) arecompatible with conduction through C fibers and Adeltafibers, respectively. Both modes of stimulation producecharacteristic brain responses that are conveyed throughdifferent types of afferent fibers. The respectivecontributions of both types of fibers to esophageal function and symptomatology can be specificallyaddressed using this approach in both normal andpathologic conditions.

Authors

Hollerbach S; Hudoba P; Fitzpatrick D; Hunt R; Upton ARM; Tougas G

Journal

Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 2558–2566

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

January 1, 1998

DOI

10.1023/a:1026667123187

ISSN

0163-2116

Contact the Experts team