The Quality and Utility of Surgical and Anesthetic Data at a Ugandan Regional Referral Hospital
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractBackgroundThere are little primary data available on the delivery or quality of surgical treatment in rural sub‐Saharan African hospitals. To initiate a quality improvement system, we characterized the existing data capture at a Ugandan Regional Referral Hospital.MethodsWe examined the surgical ward admission (January 2008–December/2011) and operating theater logbooks (January 2010–July 2011) at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital.ResultsThere were 6346 admissions recorded over three years. The mean patient age was 31.4 ± 22.3 years; 29.8 % (n = 1888) of admissions were children. Leading causes of admission were general surgical problems (n = 3050, 48.1 %), trauma (n = 2041, 32.2 %), oncology (n = 718, 11.3 %) and congenital condition (n = 193, 3.0 %). Laparotomy (n = 468, 35.3 %), incision and drainage (n = 188, 14.2 %) and hernia repair (n = 90, 6.8 %) were the most common surgical procedures. Of 1325 operative patients, 994 (75 %) had an ASA I–II score. Of patients undergoing 810 procedures booked as non‐elective, 583 (72 %) had an ASA “E” rating. Records of 41.3 % (n‐403/975) of patients age 5 years or older undergoing non‐obstetric operations were missing from the ward logbook. Missing patients were younger (25 [13,40] versus 30 [18,46] years, p = 0.002) and had higher ASA scores (ASA III‐V 29.0 % versus 18.9 %, p < 0.001) than patients recorded in the logbbook; there was no diffence in gender (male 62.8 % versus 67.0 %, p = 0.20).ConclusionsThe hospital records system measures surgical care, but improved data capture is needed to determine outcomes with sufficient accuracy to guide and record expansion of surgical capacity.
