Home
Scholarly Works
The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility...
Journal article

The osteoporosis care gap in men with fragility fractures: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study

Abstract

We examined osteoporosis diagnosis/treatment in 2,187 community dwelling men age 50+. After five years in the study, 90% of men with fragility fractures remained undiagnosed and untreated for osteoporosis. The need to treat fragility fractures is well established in guidelines, and these numbers represent an important care gap.IntroductionWhether physicians in the community are recognizing and appropriately treating osteoporosis and fragility fractures in men remains unknown. We examined the rate of diagnosis and treatment in community dwelling men participating in the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).MethodsBetween February 1996 and September 2002, 2,187 participants were recruited from nine sites across Canada and prospectively followed. Information on osteoporosis diagnosis, fractures, medications were collected annually by a detailed questionnaire. DXA examination of lumbar spine (L1-4) and hip were conducted at baseline and year five.ResultsDiagnosis and treatment in men with clinical fragility fractures was low: at baseline and year five only 2.3% and 10.3% of men with a clinical fracture reported an osteoporosis diagnosis, respectively. At year five, 90% of men with a clinical fragility fracture were untreated. Hip fractures were the most commonly treated (37.5% by year five). A diagnosis of osteoporosis resulted in greater treatment: 67% of participants with diagnosed osteoporosis were treated with a bisphosphonate and 87% were taking calcium and/or vitamin D (year five).ConclusionsIn this population-based study, both a diagnostic and therapeutic gap existed between knowledge and practice related to fragility fractures and osteoporosis in men aged ≥50 years.

Authors

Papaioannou A; Kennedy CC; Ioannidis G; Gao Y; Sawka AM; Goltzman D; Tenenhouse A; Pickard L; Olszynski WP; Davison KS

Journal

Osteoporosis International, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 581–587

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

April 1, 2008

DOI

10.1007/s00198-007-0483-0

ISSN

0937-941X

Contact the Experts team