Extension of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism Journal Articles

abstract

• SummaryWhereas every clinician agrees on the need for anticoagulation initially after the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the opinions regarding optimal duration of secondary prophylaxis differ. The decision is complicated by the large number of identified risk factors associated with the risk of recurrence. In addition consideration has to be taken to the risk factors for bleeding and individual patient preferences. Data from long-term follow-up studies up to a decade indicate that some risk factors for recurrence decline and others seem to gain importance with time. In this review data has been extracted from the most illustrative trials to highlight controversies but also where there is consensus in order to give the clinician some support for the individual decisions on extension of anticoagulation after VTE.

authors

• Schulman, Sam

status

• published 

publication date

• 2008

has subject area

• Anticoagulants (MeSH)
• Cardiovascular System & Hematology (Science Metrix)
• Clinical Trials as Topic (MeSH)
• Comorbidity (MeSH)
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug (MeSH)
• Evidence-Based Medicine (MeSH)
• Hemorrhage (MeSH)
• Humans (MeSH)
• Prevalence (MeSH)
• Risk Assessment (MeSH)
• Risk Factors (MeSH)
• Venous Thromboembolism (MeSH)

published in

• Hamostaseologie  Journal

keywords

• Anticoagulants
• Clinical Trials as Topic
• Comorbidity
• Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
• Evidence-Based Medicine
• Hemorrhage
• Humans
• Prevalence
• Risk Assessment
• Risk Factors
• Venous Thromboembolism

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

• 10.1055/s-0037-1617168

PubMed ID

• 18521488

start page

• 110

end page

• 119

volume

• 28

issue

• 03