Home
Scholarly Works
The diagnostic efficacy of urinary fractionated...
Journal article

The diagnostic efficacy of urinary fractionated metanephrines measured by tandem mass spectrometry in detection of pheochromocytoma

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are limitations to currently available biochemical tests for pheochromocytoma. Our objective was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of a novel tandem mass spectrometry assay for the measurement of fractionated urinary metanephrines in patients suspected to have a pheochromocytoma. We also developed clinically based cut-offs for positivity of this measurement. METHODS: We examined the medical records of 506 patients (including 102 patients with a catecholamine-producing tumour) who underwent measurement of 24-h urinary fractionated metanephrines using tandem mass spectrometry as well as adrenal imaging at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. The cut-offs for positivity were defined as follows: total metanephrines (sum of the metanephrine fractions) 5163 nmol/day, normetanephrine fraction 4001 nmol/day, metanephrine fraction 1531 nmol/day. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. RESULTS: The diagnostic efficacy was as follows: normetanephrine fraction sensitivity 87.3% [(95% confidence interval (CI) 79.4-92.4%], specificity 95.0% (92.5-96.8); metanephrine fraction sensitivity 56.9% (47.2-66.1), specificity 95.0% (92.5-96.8); elevation of either normetanephrine or metanephrine fraction sensitivity 97.1% (91.7-99.0) and specificity 91.1% (87.9-93.5). Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were 0.972 (95% CI 0.955-0.990) for the normetanephrine fraction, 0.800 (0.741-0.858) for the metanephrine fraction, 0.991 (0.985-0.996) for total metanephrines, and 0.991 (0.985-0.996) for a regression-derived ROC curve incorporating both the metanephrine and normetanephrine fractions. CONCLUSION: Measurement of 24-h urinary fractionated metanephrines by a tandem mass spectrometry assay appears to be an effective biochemical technique in the investigation of pheochromocytoma.

Authors

Perry CG; Sawka AM; Singh R; Thabane L; Bajnarek J; Young WF

Journal

Clinical Endocrinology, Vol. 66, No. 5, pp. 703–708

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

May 1, 2007

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.02805.x

ISSN

0300-0664

Contact the Experts team