Home
Scholarly Works
Coronary vasomotor abnormalities in patients with...
Journal article

Coronary vasomotor abnormalities in patients with stable angina after successful stent implantation but without in-stent restenosis

Abstract

BackgroundCoronary angiography is often performed in patients with recurrent or ongoing angina after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in search of an in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, in many of these patients, no significant ISR can be detected. We speculate that enhanced coronary vasoconstriction represents an alternative explanation for angina in these patients.MethodsFrom 1,285 patients with angiographically unobstructed coronaries (no stenosis ≥50 %) who underwent intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing (ACH-test) between 2008 and 2011, we consecutively recruited 104 patients (42 female (40 %), mean age 64 ± 11 years) who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: previous stent implantation due to obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), ongoing/recurrent exertional angina, no significant (<50 %) ISR.ResultsIn fifty-one patients with previous PCI (49 %), the ACH-test elicited enhanced epicardial vasoconstriction (≥75 % diameter reduction with reproduction of the patient’s symptoms) and microvascular vasoconstriction (reproduction of symptoms, ischemic ECG-changes and no epicardial vasoconstriction) was seen in 18 additional patients (17 %). The ACH-test was uneventful in the remaining 35 patients (34 %). Epicardial vasoconstriction in patients with previous PCI was most often distal and diffuse (31/51, 61 %, p < 0.01).ConclusionEnhanced epicardial and microvascular coronary vasoconstrictions are frequently found in patients with stable angina after successful PCI but without significant ISR. Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing may be useful in these patients to determine the cause of angina and initiate appropriate medical treatment.

Authors

Ong P; Athanasiadis A; Perne A; Mahrholdt H; Schäufele T; Hill S; Sechtem U

Journal

Clinical Research in Cardiology, Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 11–19

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

January 1, 2014

DOI

10.1007/s00392-013-0615-9

ISSN

1861-0684

Contact the Experts team