Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Routine Surveillance Versus Independent Assessment...
Journal article

Routine Surveillance Versus Independent Assessment by an Outcome Adjudication Committee in Assessing Patients for Sternal Surgical Site Infections After Cardiac Surgery

Abstract

Based on a cohort of 966 patients, routine surveillance data were not sufficiently accurate for use in clinical trials investigating surgical site infections. Surveillance data can only be used if adequate 90-day follow-up is provided and if cases identified by surveillance are independently reviewed by a blinded outcome adjudication committee.

Authors

Mertz D; Whitlock R; Kokoszka AY; Smith SW; Carignan A; Rehan M; Jaffer IH; Alsagheir A; Loeb M

Journal

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 37, No. 5, pp. 600–602

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Publication Date

May 2016

DOI

10.1017/ice.2015.347

ISSN

0899-823X