Home
Scholarly Works
Does the location of thrombosis determine the risk...
Journal article

Does the location of thrombosis determine the risk of disease recurrence in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis?∗∗Access the “Journal Club” discussion of this paper at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ajmselect/

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the location of deep vein thrombosis is a predictor of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy. METHODS: The study population consisted of 1,149 consecutive patients with symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis. In all patients, deep vein thrombosis was confirmed by Duplex ultrasound or venography and was classified as popliteal, femoral, or iliofemoral. Patients received initial treatment with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin, or reviparin for least 4 days, as well as a coumarin derivative, with a target international normalized ratio of 2.0 to 3.0, starting on the 1st or 2nd day of treatment. All patients were followed for 3 months, and all episodes of recurrent venous thromboembolism were confirmed with objective diagnostic tests. RESULTS: The overall rate of recurrent venous thromboembolism during the initial 3 months of anticoagulant therapy was 5.5% (63/1,149). The rate of recurrence in patients with popliteal vein thrombosis was 5.1% (23/453); in patients with femoral vein thrombosis, it was 5.3% (34/645); and in patients with iliofemoral vein thrombosis, it was 11.8% (6/51). Two clinical risk factors were associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: iliofemoral vein thrombosis (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95, 5.9), and cancer (OR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5, 4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with extensive iliofemoral vein thrombosis who receive conventional anticoagulant therapy have a greater than twofold higher risk of developing recurrent venous thromboembolism than patients without iliac vein involvement (i.e., 11.8% vs. 5.2%). Prospective studies are needed to determine whether alternative antithrombotic strategies are warranted in such patients.

Authors

Douketis JD; Crowther MA; Foster GA; Ginsberg JS

Journal

The American Journal of Medicine, Vol. 110, No. 7, pp. 515–519

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2001

DOI

10.1016/s0002-9343(01)00661-1

ISSN

0002-9343

Contact the Experts team