Capital Tax Competition and Returns to Scale
Scholarly Editions
Overview
Overview
abstract
That some capital importing regions subsidize units of capital is inconsistent with the standard
models of the capital tax competition literature. We maintain the assumption of capital homogeneity and relax
the assumption of constant returns to scale. Among other things, we show that symmetric regions in a Nash
equilibrium may subsidize capital as may a capital importing region in an asymmetric Nash equilibrium. We also
prove that any ine.ciencies in asymmetric Nash equilibria with both capital and head taxes arise entirely from
regions’ incentives to manipulate the terms of trade, and not from increasing returns. We also show the result
that small regions win tax competitions in Nash equilibria with capital taxes only may not hold with increasing
returns.