Total hip replacement: the case for noncemented femoral fixation because of age. Academic Article uri icon

  • Overview
  • Research
  • Identity
  • Additional Document Info
  • View All


  • Both noncemented fixation and improved cemented fixation of total hip replacements emerged to counteract the clinical and radiographic failures of early cemented procedures. A randomized clinical trial comparing a second-generation cemented with a second-generation noncemented total hip replacement demonstrated that in the medium term both implants allow excellent, disease-specific, global and functional capacity outcome measures. No significant differences existed between the cemented and noncemented implants in terms of these parameters or revision rate. Cost-to-utility analyses of both types of replacements revealed that total hip replacement is one of the most cost-effective medical interventions. Noncemented total hip replacements seem as efficacious as cemented devices in patients younger than 70 years.


  • Bourne, RB
  • Rorabeck, CH
  • Laupacis, A
  • Feeny, David
  • Tugwell, PS
  • Wong, C
  • Bullas, R

publication date

  • February 1995