Predicting dose response to prostate cancer radiotherapy: validation of a radiation signature in the randomized phase III NRG/RTOG 0126 and SAKK 09/10 trials. Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • BACKGROUND: The SAKK 09/10 trial randomized biochemically recurrent prostate cancer patients to salvage radiation 64 Gy versus 70 Gy, and the NRG/RTOG 0126 randomized intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients to definitive radiation 70.2 Gy versus 79.2 Gy. We investigated a previously developed Post-Operative Radiation Therapy Outcomes Score (PORTOS) to identify preferential benefit from radiation dose escalation (DE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PORTOS was evaluated in patients enrolled in SAKK 09/10 and NRG/RTOG 0126 with available tissue that passed quality control (n = 226, 215). PORTOS was evaluated in the published post-operative groups in SAKK 09/10 and in tertiles in NRG/RTOG 0126 as cut-offs had not been established for biopsy samples and definitive radiation patients. Clinical and molecular correlates in a real-world dataset of 42 407 prostatectomy and 31 107 biopsy samples were also analyzed. RESULTS: In SAKK 09/10, the biomarker-treatment interaction was statistically significant between PORTOS (lower versus higher) and treatment arm for clinical progression-free survival. Only patients in the higher PORTOS group benefited from DE. In NRG/RTOG 0126, in patients with a lower tertile PORTOS, there was no difference in Phoenix biochemical failure (BF). However, for patients in the average and higher tertile PORTOS range, there was a significant benefit for DE for Phoenix BF. An interaction test indicated a significant difference in benefit for DE between higher and lower PORTOS groups. PORTOS was not strongly associated with clinicopathological variables in either trial or the large real-world dataset. In the latter, PORTOS was modestly associated with hypoxia signatures and strongly associated with immune signatures and subtypes. CONCLUSION: In the SAKK 09/10 and RTOG 0126 randomized controlled trials, we demonstrated that PORTOS can potentially identify a subset of patients who benefit from DE, a subgroup that cannot be identified using clinicopathological or prognostic variables. These results suggest that PORTOS could be used clinically as a predictor of radiation response.

authors

  • Dal Pra, A
  • Ghadjar, P
  • Ryu, HM
  • Proudfoot, JA
  • Hayoz, S
  • Michalski, JM
  • Spratt, DE
  • Liu, Y
  • Schär, C
  • Berlin, AM
  • Zwahlen, DR
  • Simko, JP
  • Hölscher, T
  • Efstathiou, JA
  • Polat, B
  • Sandler, HM
  • Hildebrandt, G
  • Parliament, MB
  • Mueller, A-C
  • Dayes, Ian Stuart
  • Plasswilm, L
  • Correa, RJM
  • Robertson, JM
  • Karrison, TG
  • Davicioni, E
  • Hall, WA
  • Feng, FY
  • Pollack, A
  • Thalmann, GN
  • Nguyen, PL
  • Aebersold, DM
  • Tran, PT
  • Zhao, SG

publication date

  • February 13, 2025