Patient, caregiver and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives: a scoping review protocol Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • IntroductionPatient engagement and integrated knowledge translation (iKT) processes improve health outcomes and care experiences through meaningful partnerships in consensus-building initiatives and research. Consensus-building is essential for engaging a diverse group of experienced knowledge users in co-developing and supporting a solution where none readily exists or is less optimal. Patients and caregivers provide invaluable insights for building consensus in decision-making around healthcare, policy and research. However, despite emerging evidence, patient engagement remains sparse within consensus-building initiatives. Specifically, our research has identified a lack of opportunity for youth living with chronic health conditions and their caregivers to participate in developing consensus on indicators/benchmarks for transition into adult care. To bridge this gap and inform our consensus-building approach with youth/caregivers, this scoping review will synthesise the extent of the literature on patient and other knowledge user engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Methods and analysisFollowing the scoping review methodology from Joanna Briggs Institute, published literature will be searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases from inception to July 2023. Grey literature will be hand-searched. Two independent reviewers will determine the eligibility of articles in a two-stage process, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Included studies must be consensus-building studies within the healthcare context that involve patient engagement strategies. Data from eligible studies will be extracted and charted on a standardised form. Abstracted data will be analysed quantitatively and descriptively, according to specific consensus methodologies, and patient engagement models and/or strategies.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this scoping review protocol. The review process and findings will be shared with and informed by relevant knowledge users. Dissemination of findings will also include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. The results will offer new insights for supporting patient engagement in consensus-building healthcare initiatives.Protocol registrationhttps://osf.io/beqjr

authors

  • Munce, Sarah EP
  • Wong, Elliott
  • Luong, Dorothy
  • Rao, Justin
  • Cunningham, Jessie
  • Bailey, Katherine
  • John, Tomisin
  • Barber, Claire
  • Batthish, Michelle
  • Chambers, Kyle
  • Cleverley, Kristin
  • Crabtree, Marilyn
  • Diaz, Sanober
  • Dimitropoulos, Gina
  • Gorter, Jan Willem
  • Grahovac, Danijela
  • Grimes, Ruth
  • Guttman, Beverly
  • Hébert, Michèle L
  • Henze, Megan
  • Higgins, Amanda
  • Khodyakov, Dmitry
  • Li, Elaine
  • Lo, Lisha
  • Macgregor, Laura
  • Mooney, Sarah
  • Severino, Samadhi Mora
  • Mukerji, Geetha
  • Penner, Melanie
  • Pidduck, Jacklynn
  • Shulman, Rayzel
  • Stromquist, Lisa
  • Trbovich, Patricia
  • Wan, Michelle
  • Williams, Laura
  • Yates, Darryl
  • Toulany, Alene

publication date

  • May 2024