Characteristics, Progression, and Output of Randomized Platform Trials Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • ImportancePlatform trials have become increasingly common, and evidence is needed to determine how this trial design is actually applied in current research practice.ObjectiveTo determine the characteristics, progression, and output of randomized platform trials.Evidence ReviewIn this systematic review of randomized platform trials, Medline, Embase, Scopus, trial registries, gray literature, and preprint servers were searched, and citation tracking was performed in July 2022. Investigators were contacted in February 2023 to confirm data accuracy and to provide updated information on the status of platform trial arms. Randomized platform trials were eligible if they explicitly planned to add or drop arms. Data were extracted in duplicate from protocols, publications, websites, and registry entries. For each platform trial, design features such as the use of a common control arm, use of nonconcurrent control data, statistical framework, adjustment for multiplicity, and use of additional adaptive design features were collected. Progression and output of each platform trial were determined by the recruitment status of individual arms, the number of arms added or dropped, and the availability of results for each intervention arm.FindingsThe search identified 127 randomized platform trials with a total of 823 arms; most trials were conducted in the field of oncology (57 [44.9%]) and COVID-19 (45 [35.4%]). After a more than twofold increase in the initiation of new platform trials at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the number of platform trials has since declined. Platform trial features were often not reported (not reported: nonconcurrent control, 61 of 127 [48.0%]; multiplicity adjustment for arms, 98 of 127 [77.2%]; statistical framework, 37 of 127 [29.1%]). Adaptive design features were only used by half the studies (63 of 127 [49.6%]). Results were available for 65.2% of closed arms (230 of 353). Premature closure of platform trial arms due to recruitment problems was infrequent (5 of 353 [1.4%]).Conclusions and RelevanceThis systematic review found that platform trials were initiated most frequently during the COVID-19 pandemic and declined thereafter. The reporting of platform features and the availability of results were insufficient. Premature arm closure for poor recruitment was rare.

authors

  • Griessbach, Alexandra
  • Schönenberger, Christof Manuel
  • Taji Heravi, Ala
  • Gloy, Viktoria
  • Agarwal, Arnav
  • Hallenberger, Tim Jonas
  • Schandelmaier, Stefan
  • Janiaud, Perrine
  • Amstutz, Alain
  • Covino, Manuela
  • Mall, David
  • Speich, Benjamin
  • Briel, Matthias

publication date

  • March 4, 2024