Though five‐strand hamstring autografts demonstrate greater graft diameter, postoperative outcomes are equivocal to four‐strand hamstring autograft preparations: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of level I and II studies
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
AbstractPurposeTo compare graft dimensions, functional outcomes, and failure rates following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with either five‐strand or four‐strand hamstring autograft options.MethodsThree databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE) were searched from inception to 22 April 2023 for level I and II studies comparing five‐ and four‐strand hamstring autografts in ACLR. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R‐AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details and rehabilitation, graft diameter, patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, and graft rupture were extracted. PROMs included Knee Osteoarthritis and Outcome Score (KOOS) subscales, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).ResultsOne randomized controlled trial (RCT) and four prospective cohort studies with 572 patients were included. Graft diameters were larger in the five‐strand group with a mean difference of 0.93 mm (95% CI 0.61 to 1.25, p < 0.001, I2 = 66%). The five‐strand group reported statistically higher KOOS ADL subscale and Lysholm scores with a mean difference of 4.85 (95% CI 0.14 to 9.56, p = 0.04, I2 = 19%) and 3.01 (95% CI 0.48 to 5.53, p = 0.02, I2 = 0%), respectively. There were no differences in KOOS symptoms, pain, quality of life, or sports subscales, or IKDC scores. There were no differences in rates of positive Lachman test, positive pivot shift test, or graft rupture with pooled odds ratios of 0.62 (95% CI 0.13 to 2.91, n.s., I2 = 80%), 0.94 (95% CI 0.51 to 1.75, n.s., I2 = 31%), and 2.13 (95% CI 0.38 to 12.06, n.s., I2 = 0%), respectively.ConclusionsAlthough five‐stranded hamstring autografts had significantly larger graft diameters compared to four‐stranded grafts with a mean difference of 0.93 mm, similar graft rupture rates and clinical laxity assessments were identified following ACLR. While some PROMs were statistically superior in the five‐stranded hamstring groups, the threshold for the minimal clinical important difference was not reached indicating similar clinical outcomes overall.Level of EvidenceLevel II.
