Abstract 3640: Diabetes Mellitus is Associated with Increased Risk of Fatal and Non-Fatal Cardiovascular Events in Heart Failure Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction - Findings From the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function Trial Journal Articles uri icon

  •  
  • Overview
  •  
  • Research
  •  
  • Identity
  •  
  • Additional Document Info
  •  
  • View All
  •  

abstract

  • Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM), present in about a quarter of heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF), is associated with increased risk of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular (CV) events. Less is known about the prevalence and impact of DM in HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HF-PEF). The prevalence and effect of DM on clinical outcomes were examined in patients enrolled in the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Systolic Function Trial (I-PRESERVE). Methods: The I-PRESERVE trial randomized 4128 HF-PEF patients (EF≥45%) to receive irbesartan or placebo. The primary outcome of time to all-cause mortality or CV hospitalization (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, worsening HF, atrial or ventricular arrhythmia or unstable angina) was compared between patients with and without DM over one year of follow-up. A combined HF endpoint (HF mortality and hospitalization) was also evaluated. Comparison of the outcomes between patients with and without DM was expressed as a hazard ratio (HR). The independent predictive role of DM was examined in a multivariable model (which included symptoms, signs, clinical history, CV examination, biochemical, and hematological findings). Results: In I-PRESERVE 27% had a history of DM at baseline. DM patients more often had a body mass index ≥30 (51% vs 38%), history of stroke (12% vs 9%), history of MI (28% vs 22%), estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73m 2 (34% vs 29%), and pulmonary congestion on chest x-ray (46% vs 38%). In patients with DM, 17% and 11% had primary and HF events, respectively within 1 year; for patients without DM, 11% and 6% had primary and HF events. In a multivariate analysis DM remained a significant predictor of primary events (HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.22, 1.79) or HF events (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.32, 2.12). Conclusions: The prevalence of DM in HF-PEF is similar to that reported in HF-REF. HF-PEF patients with DM have a significantly worse outcome than those without DM and this increased risk is independent of other factors associated with a worse prognosis.

authors

  • McKelvie, Robert
  • Komajda, Michel
  • Massie, Barry M
  • McMurray, John J
  • Zile, Michael R
  • Donovan, Mark
  • Ptaszynska, Agata
  • Carson, Peter

publication date

  • October 16, 2007