The effect of digital interventions on related health literacy and skills for individuals living with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic diseases are a leading cause of death and disease burden globally. Digital interventions could be an approach to improve patients' ability to find, evaluate, and use health information. OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to conduct a systematic review to determine the effect of digital interventions on digital health literacy for patients living with chronic disease. Secondary objectives were to provide an overviewof the design and delivery characteristics of interventions that impact digital health literacy in people with chronic disease. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials examining digital health literacy (and related components) for individuals with cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, osteoarthritis, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and HIV were identified. This review was conducted following the PRIMSA guidelines. Certainty was assessed using GRADE and the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted using Review Manager 5.1. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022375967). RESULTS: 9386 articles were identified and 17 articles representing 16 unique trials were included. Studies evaluated 5138 individuals with one or more chronic conditions (50% women, ages 42 ± 7-71 ± 12 years). The most targeted conditions were cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and HIV. Interventions included: skills training, websites, electronic personal health records, remote patient monitoring, and education. The effects of the interventions were related to: (i) digital health literacy, (ii) health literacy, (iii) health information skills, (iv) technology skills and access, and (v) self-management and participation in care. A meta-analysis of three studies identified the effect of digital interventions was better than usual care for eHealth literacy (1.22 [CI 0.55, 1.89], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of the effects of digital interventions on related health literacy is limited. Existing studies reflect the heterogeneity in study design, population, and outcome measures. There is a need for further studies on the effects of digital interventions on related health literacy for individuals with chronic conditions.
