Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A systematic review of the quality of publications...
Journal article

A systematic review of the quality of publications reporting Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) trials

Abstract

PurposeSeveral studies have shown that the quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCT) is variable and often poor. Since the results of meta-analyses on the comparison of off-pump (OFCAB) and on-pump (ONCAB) techniques are controversial, we aimed to assess the reporting quality of the RCTs on comparing OFCAB and ONCAB surgery.MethodsRCTs published (2000 to 2004) comparing OFCAB and ONCAB were identified from electronic searches of …

Authors

Farrokhyar F; Chu R; Whitlock R; Thabane L

Journal

Annals of Epidemiology, Vol. 15, No. 8,

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

September 2005

DOI

10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.06.042

ISSN

1047-2797