Enhancing the Trustworthiness of the Endocrine Society’s Clinical Practice Guidelines Academic Article uri icon

  • Overview
  • Research
  • Identity
  • Additional Document Info
  • View All


  • Abstract In an effort to enhance the trustworthiness of its clinical practice guidelines, the Endocrine Society has recently adopted new policies and more rigorous methodologies for its guideline program. In this Clinical Practice Guideline Communication, we describe these recent enhancements—many of which reflect greater adherence to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to guideline development—in addition to the rationale for such changes. Improvements to the Society’s guideline development practices include, but are not limited to, enhanced inclusion of nonendocrinologist experts, including patient representatives, on guideline development panels; implementation of a more rigorous conflict/duality of interest policy; a requirement that all formal recommendations must be demonstrably underpinned by systematic evidence review; the explicit use of GRADE Evidence-to-Decision frameworks; greater use and explanation of standardized guideline language; and a more intentional approach to guideline updating. Lastly, we describe some of the experiential differences our guideline readers are most likely to notice.


  • McCartney, Christopher R
  • Corrigan, Maureen D
  • Drake, Matthew T
  • El-Hajj Fuleihan, Ghada
  • Korytkowski, Mary T
  • Lash, Robert W
  • Lieb, David C
  • McCall, Anthony L
  • Muniyappa, Ranganath
  • Piggott, Thomas
  • Santesso, Nancy
  • Schunemann, Holger
  • Wiercioch, Wojtek
  • McDonnell, Marie E
  • Murad, M Hassan

publication date

  • July 14, 2022