Abstract 10249: Association of Eligibility for a Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
Introduction:
Heart failure (HF) is the leading cause of death in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce HF in a broad range of populations, they have not been studied specifically in patients with AF.
Objective:
We aimed to determine the proportion of AF patients who are eligible for an SGLT2i based on co-morbidities, and compare their risk of cardiovascular outcomes to ineligible patients.
Methods:
We pooled data from two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AF patients (RE-LY and ACTIVE-W). Among patients assigned to the anticoagulation arms, those meeting the inclusion criteria from at least one of the large Phase 3 SGLT2i RCTs were included in the “SGLT2i-eligible” and the others in the “SGLT2i-ineligible” group. Eligibility indications were diabetes mellitus + cardiovascular disease (DM+CVD), HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and renal disease. We examined a primary outcome of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for HF, and compared study outcomes between SGLT2i-eligible and ineligible groups.
Results:
A total of 21485 AF patients (mean age: 71.2±8.8, 36.1% women, Median CHA
2
DS
2
-VASc Score = 3, IQR 2-4) met inclusion. The proportion of AF patients eligible for treatment with an SGLT2i was 23.6%, with 8.9%, 22.6%, 9.1% being eligible for Empagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, and Canagliflozin, respectively. Renal disease (17.6%) was the most common eligibility indication, followed by DM+CVD (9.0%) and HFrEF (5.3%). After a median follow-up of 1.9 years, the incidence of cardiovascular death/hospitalization for HF (10.9% vs. 6.3%, p<0.001), cardiovascular death (5.2% vs. 2.4%, p<0.001), hospitalization for HF (6.8% vs. 4.2%, p<0.001), hospitalization for AF (6.7% vs. 5.4%, p<0.001), and thromboembolic events (4.9% vs. 3.9%, p=0.003) was significantly higher in the SGLT2i-eligible than the ineligible group.
Conclusion:
The majority of AF patients are not eligible for an SGLT2i. Although these patients are lower-risk than eligible patients, they still have high rates of cardiovascular events. RCTs are needed to test the efficacy of SGLT2is in AF patients.
