Home
Scholarly Works
A proof-theoretic foundation of abortive...
Journal article

A proof-theoretic foundation of abortive continuations

Abstract

Abstract We give an analysis of various classical axioms and characterize a notion of minimal classical logic that enforces Peirce’s law without enforcing Ex Falso Quodlibet. We show that a “natural” implementation of this logic is Parigot’s classical natural deduction. We then move on to the computational side and emphasize that Parigot’s λμ corresponds to minimal classical logic. A continuation constant must be added to λμ to get full classical logic. The extended calculus is isomorphic to a syntactical restriction of Felleisen’s theory of control that offers a more expressive reduction semantics. This isomorphic calculus is in correspondence with a refined version of Prawitz’s natural deduction.

Authors

Ariola ZM; Herbelin H; Sabry A

Journal

Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 403–429

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

December 1, 2007

DOI

10.1007/s10990-007-9007-z

ISSN

1388-3690

Contact the Experts team