Home
Scholarly Works
Interviewer versus self-administered...
Journal article

Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthma

Abstract

We wished to determine the extent to which respondents provided the same answers to a health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaire in self- and interviewer-administered forms. One hundred and fifty patients with asthma who were symptomatic or required treatment at least once a week, and had airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine aerosol (PC20 < 8.0 mg/ml) participated. Patients completed a 152-item HRQL questionnaire in both interviewer and self-administered forms, separated by a 2-week interval, the order determined by random allocation. The percentage of items endorsed by the self-administered approach was significantly higher than that of the interviewer-administered approach overall (46.9 vs 35.8%) (p < 0.0001). The difference was consistent across all six domains; the absolute difference in the proportion of items endorsed varied from 8.9 to 12.3%. The intraclass correlations for the proportion of subjects endorsing an item was 0.84. Self- and interviewer-administered questionnaires yield very similar results in discriminating between subjects, but the self-administered version shows systematically greater HRQL impairment.

Authors

Cook DJ; Guyatt GH; Juniper E; Griffith L; McIlroy W; Willan A; Jaeschke R; Epstein R

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 529–534

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 1993

DOI

10.1016/0895-4356(93)90125-k

ISSN

0895-4356

Contact the Experts team