Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Comparing the Acceptability, Clinical-, and...
Conference

Comparing the Acceptability, Clinical-, and Cost-effectiveness of Mental Health E-screening to Paper-based Screening in Pregnant Women: a Randomized, Parallel-group, Superiority Trial

Abstract

Substantial barriers to prenatal mental health screening exist. The primary objective of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the acceptability of computer tablet-based prenatal screening compared to paper-based screening. Secondary objectives are to compare the two screening modes on: (1) detection of depression/anxiety symptoms; (2) disclosure of symptoms; (3) factors associated with acceptability, and disclosure; (4) psychometric …

Authors

Kingston D; Kingston D; McDonald S; Biringer A; Austin MP; McDonald SD; Giallo R; Ohinmaa A; Lasiuk G; MacQueen G

Volume

30

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Publication Date

March 2015

DOI

10.1016/s0924-9338(15)30773-2

Conference proceedings

European Psychiatry

ISSN

0924-9338