Detecting lumbar lesions in 99mTc‐MDP SPECT by deep learning: Comparison with physicians Journal Articles uri icon

  • Overview
  • Research
  • Identity
  • Additional Document Info
  • View All


  • AbstractPurpose99mTc‐MDP single‐photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an established tool for diagnosing lumbar stress, a common cause of low back pain (LBP) in pediatric patients. However, detection of small stress lesions is complicated by the low quality of SPECT, leading to significant interreader variability. The study objectives were to develop an approach based on a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for detecting lumbar lesions in 99mTc‐MDP scans and to compare its performance to that of physicians in a localization receiver operating characteristic (LROC) study.MethodsSixty‐five lesion‐absent (LA) 99mTc‐MDP studies performed in pediatric patients for evaluating LBP were retrospectively identified. Projections for an artificial focal lesion were acquired separately by imaging a 99mTc capillary tube at multiple distances from the collimator. An approach was developed to automatically insert lesions into LA scans to obtain realistic lesion‐present (LP) 99mTc‐MDP images while ensuring knowledge of the ground truth. A deep CNN was trained using 2.5D views extracted in LP and LA 99mTc‐MDP image sets. During testing, the CNN was applied in a sliding‐window fashion to compute a 3D “heatmap” reporting the probability of a lesion being present at each lumbar location. The algorithm was evaluated using cross‐validation on a 99mTc‐MDP test dataset which was also studied by five physicians in a LROC study. LP images in the test set were obtained by incorporating lesions at sites selected by a physician based on clinical likelihood of injury in this population.ResultsThe deep learning (DL) system slightly outperformed human observers, achieving an area under the LROC curve (AUCLROC) of 0.830 (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.758, 0.924]) compared with 0.785 (95% CI: [0.738, 0.830]) for physicians. The AUCLROC for the DL system was higher than that of two readers (difference in AUCLROC [ΔAUCLROC] = 0.049 and 0.053) who participated to the study and slightly lower than that of two other readers (ΔAUCLROC = −0.006 and −0.012). Another reader outperformed DL by a more substantial margin (ΔAUCLROC = −0.053).ConclusionThe DL system provides comparable or superior performance than physicians in localizing small 99mTc‐MDP positive lumbar lesions.


  • Petibon, Yoann
  • Fahey, Frederic
  • Cao, Xinhua
  • Levin, Zakhar
  • Sexton‐Stallone, Briana
  • Falone, Anthony
  • Zukotynski, Katherine
  • Kwatra, Neha
  • Lim, Ruth
  • Bar‐Sever, Zvi
  • Chemli, Yanis
  • Treves, S Ted
  • Fakhri, Georges El
  • Ouyang, Jinsong

publication date

  • August 2021