Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional...
Journal article

Rationale and design of repeated cross-sectional studies to evaluate the reporting quality of trial protocols: the Adherence to SPIrit REcommendations (ASPIRE) study and associated projects

Abstract

BackgroundClearly structured and comprehensive protocols are an essential component to ensure safety of participants, data validity, successful conduct, and credibility of results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Funding agencies, research ethics committees (RECs), regulatory agencies, medical journals, systematic reviewers, and other stakeholders rely on protocols to appraise the conduct and reporting of RCTs. In response to evidence of …

Authors

Gryaznov D; Odutayo A; von Niederhäusern B; Speich B; Kasenda B; Ojeda-Ruiz E; Blümle A; Schandelmaier S; Mertz D; Tomonaga Y

Journal

Trials, Vol. 21, No. 1,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

December 2020

DOI

10.1186/s13063-020-04808-y

ISSN

1468-6708