Home
Scholarly Works
The proportion of variation in perioperative...
Journal article

The proportion of variation in perioperative transfusion decisions in Canada attributable to the hospital

Abstract

PurposeHospital variation in transfusion practices has been described previously but the proportion of variation attributable to the hospital has not. The objective of this report was to quantify hospital variation in red cell transfusion decisions perioperatively for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).MethodsWe used a cross-sectional study design using pretestedself-administered mailed questionnaires sent to all anesthesiologists and cardiac surgeons involved in CABG in Canada.ResultsResponses were received from anesthesiologists from all 32 hospital sites and from cardiac surgeons from 30/32 sites (94%). There was variation attributable to the hospital in transfusion triggers selected (P < 0.0001). For patients who had uncomplicated CABG surgery, the range of transfusion triggers among hospitals for the intraoperative and postoperative case scenarios were 61 to 80 g·L-1 and 64 to 80 g·L-1, respectively. The hospital accounted for 20% of the variation in the transfusion practice intraoperatively and postoperatively. The remainder of the variation was attributable to the individual physician. Academic affiliation and the number of surgical cases performed at the hospital were not significant factors impacting on the transfusion triggers selectedConclusionThis is the first study to quantify the variation in red cell transfusion practices according to individual physicians and the hospital. The variation attributed to the hospital is significant. The explanation for the variation in transfusion decisions that relate to the hospital needs to be explored further in order to help optimize transfusion practice.

Authors

Shehata N; Wilson K; Mazer CD; Tomlinson G; Streiner D; Hébert P; Naglie G

Journal

Journal canadien d'anesthésie, Vol. 54, No. 11,

Publisher

Springer Nature

Publication Date

January 1, 2007

DOI

10.1007/bf03026794

ISSN

0832-610X

Contact the Experts team