Conference
Mining Maple code for contracts
Abstract
We wish to answer the following question: what is the most appropriate language for describing the "contracts" that Maple routines offer? In this, we are seeking much more than types (which Maple does not have, at least statically), as these are not sufficiently expressive to capture what is going on. We also wish to study what is actually in Maple, rather than what should be there. Put another way, we do not expect to find that a type system …
Authors
Carette J; Forrest S
Pagination
pp. 36-51
Publication Date
January 1, 2006
Conference proceedings
Informal Proceedings 13th Symposium on the Integration of Symbolic Computation and Mechanized Reasoning Calculemus 2006