Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow...
Journal article

A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: In routine clinical practice, the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is assessed on axial magnetic resonance images (MRI) typically acquired using a preselected spine sagittal angle. Given the natural lordosis of the lumbar spine, not all axial slices will be parallel to the disc and perpendicular to the spinal canal and, thus, are not optimal for the assessment of dural sac cross-sectional area (DCSA). PURPOSE: The …

Authors

Macedo LG; Bodnar A; Battié MC

Journal

The Spine Journal, Vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 884–888

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

July 2016

DOI

10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.050

ISSN

1529-9430