Patient motivational language in the prediction of symptom change, clinically significant response, and time to response in psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder.
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
Existing research demonstrates that patient change-talk (CT), or self-arguments for change, associates variably with favorable outcomes, whereas counter change-talk (CCT), or self-arguments against change, associates consistently with poorer outcomes. However, most studies on change language have focused on posttreatment versus more proximal outcomes. Addressing this gap, we examined Session 1 CT and CCT as predictors of during-treatment worry change, likelihood of clinically significant response during treatment, and time to response across cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; n = 43) and CBT integrated with motivational interviewing (MI; n = 42) for generalized anxiety disorder. We also explored whether treatment moderated these associations. Multilevel modeling revealed that, across both treatments, more CT associated with lower midtreatment worry level (p = .04), whereas more CCT associated with lower worry level (p = .048) and a slower rate of worry reduction at midtreatment (p = .04). Treatment moderated only the associations between CT and both midtreatment worry level (p = .03) and rate of change (p = .03). CBT patients with higher versus lower CT had lower worry and a faster rate of worry reduction; in MI-CBT, CT was unrelated to these outcomes. Survival analyses revealed that, across both treatments, more CT associated with a greater likelihood of response (p = .004) and approached a faster time to response (p = .05), and more CCT associated with a lower likelihood of response (p = .001) and approached a slower time to response (p = .06). Motivational language predicts proximal outcomes and may be useful in treatment selection. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
