A systematic review of rehabilitation protocols following surgical repair of the extensor pollicis longus

Introduction The goal of this systematic review was to determine which rehabilitation protocol (static, dynamic or early active) yields the best outcomes following repair of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon in the following domains: total active motion (TAM), grip strength and range of motion. Methods A comprehensive and systematic literature search was run. The retrieved abstracts and titles were screened by two independent reviewers. Rehabilitation protocols were classified as static, dynamic or early active. Methodological quality of included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were assessed using the SIGN50 scale. Results Fifteen articles were included in the final analysis ( κ = 0.8). From this total, five studies employed static splinting, 12 dynamic splinting and two early active splinting. Static splinting yielded ‘excellent’/‘good’ results ranging from 50% (minimum) to 60% (maximum) on the TAM classification system and a weighted mean TAM of 73.0 ± 24.0° (range 58.75–85°). Dynamic splinting studies demonstrated ‘excellent’/‘good’ results ranging from 64.4% (minimum) to 98% (maximum) and a weighted mean TAM of 111.2 ± 11.7° (range 89–134°) ( P < 0.001 and mean difference of 38.2 (95% confidence interval: 32.2–44.2). In one study, early active motion resulted in 83% of patients having ‘excellent’/‘good’ ratings. Discussion The available level II–IV evidence suggests better outcomes when using dynamic splinting over static splinting for rehabilitation of the EPL tendon repair. Further evidence is required to clinically confirm the differences between early active and dynamic rehabilitation protocols.