Home
Scholarly Works
Energy efficiency impact of EGR on organizing...
Journal article

Energy efficiency impact of EGR on organizing clean combustion in diesel engines

Abstract

Exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) is a commonly recognized primary technique for reducing NOx emissions in IC engines. However, depending on the extent of its use, the application of EGR in diesel engines is associated with an increase in smoke emissions and a reduction in thermal efficiency. In this work, empirical investigations and parametric analyses are carried out to assess the impact of EGR in attaining ultra-low NOx emissions while minimizing the smoke and efficiency penalties. Two fuelling strategies are studied, namely diesel-only injection and dual-fuel injection. In the dual-fuel strategy, a high volatility liquid fuel is injected into the intake ports, and a diesel fuel is injected directly into the cylinder. The results suggest that the reduction in NOx can be directly correlated with the intake dilution caused by EGR and the correlation is largely independent of the fuelling strategy, the intake boost, and the engine load level. Simultaneously ultra-low NOx and smoke emissions can be achieved at high intake boost and intake dilution levels in the diesel-only combustion strategy and at high ethanol fractions in the dual-fuel strategy. The efficiency penalty associated with EGR is attributed to two primary factors; the combustion off-phasing and the reduction in combustion efficiency. The combustion off-phasing can be minimized by the closed loop control of the diesel injection timing in both the fuelling strategies, whereas the combustion efficiency can be improved by limiting the intake dilution to moderate levels. The theoretical and empirical analyses are summarized and the control of intake dilution and in-cylinder excess ratio is demonstrated for the mitigation of NOx and smoke emissions with minimum efficiency impact.

Authors

Divekar PS; Chen X; Tjong J; Zheng M

Journal

Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 112, , pp. 369–381

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

March 15, 2016

DOI

10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.042

ISSN

0196-8904

Contact the Experts team