An evaluation of four different measures of abdominal muscle strength: patient, order and instrument variation.

We compared 4 measures of abdominal muscle strength in 24 male subjects aged 20-52 years, 12 without low back pain (LBP) and 12 with LBP. The manometer to knee and manometer to sternum methods involved 2 positions of testing abdominal muscle strength using the adapter sphygmomanometer, a 3rd method was a scheme of graduated sit-ups, and the 4th had the sphygmomanometer bladder replaced by a disposable plastic tube and the subject blowing into the manometer. Order of methods was controlled with knee 4 x 4 latin squares. Analysis of variance showed that order of measurement was not significant [F (3,60) = 0.24, P2 = 0.725], but methods were different [F (3,60) = 86.80, P2 less than 0.01], and subjects without LBP had higher abdominal muscle strength than subjects with LBP [F (1.60) = 89.29, P2 less than 0.001]. The manometer to knee and manometer to sternum methods were equally sensitive and more sensitive than the graduated sit-up and blow into manometer methods. The manometer to sternum method was best as it was not painful and exercised the abdominals well.

An evaluation of four different measures of abdominal muscle strength: patient, order and instrument variation. Journal Articles