Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be...
Journal article

Why the Debate over Minimal Risk Needs to be Reconsidered

Abstract

Minimal risk is a central concept in the ethical analysis of research with children. It is defined as the risks ". . . ordinarily encountered in daily life . . . ." But the question arises: who is the referent for minimal risk? Commentators in the research ethics literature often answer this question by endorsing one of two possible interpretations: the uniform interpretation (which is also known as the absolute interpretation) or the relative …

Authors

Binik A; Weijer C

Journal

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 387–405

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

August 1, 2014

DOI

10.1093/jmp/jhu020

ISSN

0360-5310