Journal article
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
Abstract
GRADE suggests that examination of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provides the optimal primary approach to decisions regarding imprecision. For practice guidelines, rating down the quality of evidence (i.e., confidence in estimates of effect) is required if clinical action would differ if the upper versus the lower boundary of the CI represented the truth. An exception to this rule occurs when an effect is large, and consideration of CIs alone …
Authors
Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Rind D; Devereaux PJ; Montori VM; Freyschuss B; Vist G
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 12, pp. 1283–1293
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
December 2011
DOI
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012
ISSN
0895-4356