Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of...
Journal article

GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision

Abstract

GRADE suggests that examination of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) provides the optimal primary approach to decisions regarding imprecision. For practice guidelines, rating down the quality of evidence (i.e., confidence in estimates of effect) is required if clinical action would differ if the upper versus the lower boundary of the CI represented the truth. An exception to this rule occurs when an effect is large, and consideration of CIs alone …

Authors

Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Brozek J; Alonso-Coello P; Rind D; Devereaux PJ; Montori VM; Freyschuss B; Vist G

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 12, pp. 1283–1293

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

December 2011

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012

ISSN

0895-4356