Home
Scholarly Works
Explication as Elimination: W. V. Quine and...
Chapter

Explication as Elimination: W. V. Quine and Mathematical Structuralism

Abstract

Abstract This chapter examines the development of and motives for Quine’s particular form of mathematical structuralism. It will argue that Quine, unlike many contemporary mathematical structuralists, does not appeal to structuralism as a way of accounting for what the numbers really are in any robust metaphysical sense. Instead, his structuralism is deeply rooted in an earlier structuralist tradition found in scientific philosophers such as Russell and Carnap, which emphasized structuralism as a critique of more metaphysical approaches to philosophy. On this view, a philosophy of mathematics answers, in a sense, only to mathematics itself. An account of mathematical objects requires only that the entities—whatever they are—serving as the mathematical objects satisfy the relevant postulates and theorems. Here we also see how Quine’s early work in the foundations of mathematics leads in a natural way to the more general naturalism of his later philosophy.

Authors

Morris S

Book title

The Prehistory of Mathematical Structuralism

Pagination

pp. 421-442

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Publication Date

April 30, 2020

DOI

10.1093/oso/9780190641221.003.0016
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team