Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary...
Journal article

Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and/or Intervention A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing distal radial access (DRA) with conventional radial access (RA) is available. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a quantitative appraisal of the effects of DRA) vs conventional RA for coronary angiography with or without intervention.

Authors

Ferrante G; Condello F; Rao SV; Maurina M; Jolly S; Stefanini GG; Reimers B; Condorelli G; Lefèvre T; Pancholy SB

Journal

JACC Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 15, No. 22, pp. 2297–2311

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

November 2022

DOI

10.1016/j.jcin.2022.09.006

ISSN

1936-8798