Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
A comparison of confounder selection and...
Journal article

A comparison of confounder selection and adjustment methods for estimating causal effects using large healthcare databases

Abstract

PURPOSE: Confounding adjustment is required to estimate the effect of an exposure on an outcome in observational studies. However, variable selection and unmeasured confounding are particularly challenging when analyzing large healthcare data. Machine learning methods may help address these challenges. The objective was to evaluate the capacity of such methods to select confounders and reduce unmeasured confounding bias. METHODS: A simulation …

Authors

Benasseur I; Talbot D; Durand M; Holbrook A; Matteau A; Potter BJ; Renoux C; Schnitzer ME; Tarride J; Guertin JR

Journal

Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 424–433

Publisher

Wiley

Publication Date

4 2022

DOI

10.1002/pds.5403

ISSN

1053-8569