Experts has a new look! Let us know what you think of the updates.

Provide feedback
Home
Scholarly Works
Comparative Evaluation of Two Glass Polyalkenoate...
Journal article

Comparative Evaluation of Two Glass Polyalkenoate Cements: An In Vivo Pilot Study Using a Sheep Model

Abstract

Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is used to manage bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). However, the application of PMMA has been associated with complications such as volumetric shrinkage, necrosis, wear debris, and loosening. Glass polyalkenoate cements (GPCs) have potential bone cementation applications. Unlike PMMA, GPC does not undergo volumetric shrinkage, adheres chemically to bone, and does not undergo an exothermic …

Authors

Hasandoost L; Marx D; Zalzal P; Safir O; Hurtig M; Mehrvar C; Waldman SD; Papini M; Towler MR

Journal

Journal of Functional Biomaterials, Vol. 12, No. 3,

Publisher

MDPI

DOI

10.3390/jfb12030044

ISSN

2079-4983