Home
Scholarly Works
Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians
Journal article

Publication Bias: A Brief Review for Clinicians

Abstract

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide the highest level of evidence to guide clinical decisions and inform practice guidelines. Publication bias results from the selective publication of studies based on the direction and magnitude of their results--studies without statistical significance (negative studies) are less likely to be published. Bias results from pooling the results from published studies alone leading to overestimation of the effectiveness of the intervention. In this review we define publication bias, how it affects the results of systematic reviews, how it can be detected and minimized, and how it can be prevented.

Authors

Montori VM; Smieja M; Guyatt GH

Journal

Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 75, No. 12, pp. 1284–1288

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2000

DOI

10.4065/75.12.1284

ISSN

0025-6196

Labels

View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team