Home
Scholarly Works
GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and...
Journal article

GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

Abstract

GRADE requires a clear specification of the relevant setting, population, intervention, and comparator. It also requires specification of all important outcomes--whether evidence from research studies is, or is not, available. For a particular management question, the population, intervention, and outcome should be sufficiently similar across studies that a similar magnitude of effect is plausible. Guideline developers should specify the relative importance of the outcomes before gathering the evidence and again when evidence summaries are complete. In considering the importance of a surrogate outcome, authors should rate the importance of the patient-important outcome for which the surrogate is a substitute and subsequently rate down the quality of evidence for indirectness of outcome.

Authors

Guyatt GH; Oxman AD; Kunz R; Atkins D; Brozek J; Vist G; Alderson P; Glasziou P; Falck-Ytter Y; Schünemann HJ

Journal

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 395–400

Publisher

Elsevier

Publication Date

January 1, 2011

DOI

10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012

ISSN

0895-4356

Contact the Experts team