Journal article
Analysis and Interpretation of Treatment Effects in Subgroups of Patients in Randomized Clinical Trials
Abstract
A key principle for interpretation of subgroup results is that quantitative interactions (differences in degree) are much more likely than qualitative interactions (differences in kind). Quantitative interactions are likely to be truly present whether or not they are apparent, whereas apparent qualitative interactions should generally be disbelieved as they have usually not been replicated consistently. Therefore, the overall trial result is …
Authors
Yusuf S; Wittes J; Probstfield J; Tyroler HA
Journal
JAMA, Vol. 266, No. 1, pp. 93–98
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Publication Date
July 3, 1991
DOI
10.1001/jama.1991.03470010097038
ISSN
0098-7484