Journal article
Prospective economic evaluation alongside the non-invasive ventilation trial
Abstract
Objective:To determine the cost-effectiveness of nasal continuous positive pressure (nCPAP) compared with nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in the context of the reported randomized clinical trial.Study Design:Using patient-level data from the clinical trial, we undertook a prospectively planned economic evaluation. We measured costs, from a third-party payer perspective in all patients, and from a societal perspective in …
Authors
Mowitz ME; Zupancic JAF; Millar D; Kirpalani H; Gaulton JS; Roberts RS; Mao W; Dukhovny D
Journal
Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 61–66
Publisher
Springer Nature
Publication Date
1 2017
DOI
10.1038/jp.2016.159
ISSN
0743-8346
Associated Experts
Fields of Research (FoR)
Medical Subject Headings (MeSH)
Continuous Positive Airway PressureCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGestational AgeHealth Care CostsHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntermittent Positive-Pressure VentilationMaleNoninvasive VentilationProspective StudiesRespiratory Distress Syndrome, NewbornSensitivity and Specificity