Journal article
Agreement among reviewers of review articles
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the consistency of an index of the scientific quality of research overviews.
DESIGN: Agreement was measured among nine judges, each of whom assessed the scientific quality of 36 published review articles. ITEM SELECTION: An iterative process was used to select ten criteria relative to five key tasks entailed in conducting a research overview.
Authors
Oxman AD; Guyatt GH; Singer J; Goldsmith CH; Hutchison BG; Milner RA; Streiner DL
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 44, No. 1, pp. 91–98
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
January 1991
DOI
10.1016/0895-4356(91)90205-n
ISSN
0895-4356