Home
Scholarly Works
Common Pitfalls in the Conduct of Clinical...
Journal article

Common Pitfalls in the Conduct of Clinical Research

Abstract

Recently, paradigm shift from expert opinion towards evidence-based medicine has occurred encouraging physicians to base their treatment decisions on the best available research evidence. In the hierarchy of evidence randomized clinical trials (level 1 evidence) are considered of the highest quality (least biased) while non-randomized studies represent lower levels (levels 2-4). Several pitfalls in the design and conduct of clinical research include: lack of randomization, lack of concealment, lack of blinding, and errors in hypothesis testing (type I and II errors). A basic understanding of these principles of research will empower both investigators and readers when applying the results of research to clinical practice.

Authors

Zlowodzki M; Jönsson A; Bhandari M

Journal

Medical Principles and Practice, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–8

Publisher

Karger Publishers

Publication Date

December 1, 2005

DOI

10.1159/000089379

ISSN

1011-7571
View published work (Non-McMaster Users)

Contact the Experts team