Researchers investigating bullying from an ecological perspective have revealed that individual differences in antisocial personality and several socioeconomic contexts can contribute to bullying perpetration. However, most researchers have examined these factors from a variable-centered approach, precluding the understanding of how personality and socioeconomic factors are heterogeneously associated with bullying perpetration. We examined personality (i.e., honesty-humility), individual socioeconomic status (i.e., self-reported family income), regional income inequality (i.e., Gini index), and self-reported retrospective bullying perpetration using a person-centered approach in a sample of 371 young adults (59.9% women; Mage = 20.04; SDage = 2.05). Latent profile analyses revealed three groups. As predicted, most individuals (91.4%) reflected low bullying, moderate honesty-humility, high family income, and moderate regional income inequality (i.e., “low bullying, economic advantage” group). A smaller group (5.1%) reflected high bullying and low honesty-humility, but unexpectedly this group also reflected high family income and moderate regional income inequality (i.e., “high bullying, economic advantage” group). Finally, the smallest group (3.5%) was not expected and reflected low bullying, moderate honesty-humility, low family income, and high regional income inequality (i.e., “low bullying, economic disadvantage” group). Findings indicate that within more economically affluent regions, anti-bullying efforts should focus on ways to prevent individuals from exploiting socioeconomic power, such as by reducing competition and building social cohesion.