Home
Scholarly Works
Usability and agreement of the...
Journal article

Usability and agreement of the SWIFT-ActiveScreener systematic review support tool: Preliminary evaluation for use in clinical research

Abstract

Systematic reviews (SRs) employ standardized methodological processes for synthesizing empirical evidence to answer specific research questions. These processes include rigorous screening phases to determine eligibility of articles against strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Despite these processes, SRs are a significant undertaking, and this type of research often necessitates extensive human resource requirements, especially when the scope of the review is large. Given the substantial resources and time commitment required, we investigated a way in which the screening process might be accelerated while maintaining high fidelity and adherence to SR processes. More recently, researchers have turned to artificial intelligence-based (AI) software to expedite the screening process. This paper evaluated the agreement and usability of a novel machine learning program, Sciome SWIFT-ActiveScreener (ActiveScreener), in a large SR of mental health outcomes following treatment for PTSD. ActiveScreener exceeded the expected 95% agreement of the program with screeners to predict inclusion or exclusion of relevant articles at the title/abstract assessment phase of the review and was reported to be user friendly by both novice and seasoned screeners. ActiveScreener, when used appropriately, may be a useful tool when performing SR in a clinical context.

Authors

Liu JJW; Ein N; Gervasio J; Easterbrook B; Nouri MS; Nazarov A; Richardson JD

Journal

PLOS ONE, Vol. 19, No. 11,

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Publication Date

November 1, 2024

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0291163

ISSN

1932-6203

Contact the Experts team