The conundrum of high-grade hydronephrosis with non-obstructive drainage on diuretic renography
Journal Articles
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with high grade hydronephrosis (HN) and non-obstructive drainage on mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) diuretic renography (renal scans) can pose a dilemma for clinicians. Some patients may progress and require pyeloplasty; however, more clarity is needed on outcomes among these patients. OBJECTIVE: Our primary objective was to predict which patients with high-grade HN and non-obstructive renal scan, (defined as T ½ time <20 min) would experience resolution of HN. Our secondary objective was to determine predictors for surgical intervention. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with prenatally detected HN were prospectively enrolled from 7 centers from 2007 to 2022. Included patients had a renal scan with T ½<20 min and Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) grade 3 or 4 at last ultrasound (RBUS) prior to renal scan. Primary outcome was resolution of HN defined as SFU grade 1 and anterior posterior diameter of the renal pelvis (APD) < 10 mm on follow-up RBUS. Secondary outcome was pyeloplasty, comparing patients undergoing pyeloplasty with patients followed with serial imaging without resolution. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the total 2228 patients, 1311 had isolated HN, 338 patients had a renal scan and 129 met inclusion criteria. Median age at renal scan was 3.1 months, 77% were male and median follow-up was 35 months (IQR 20-49). We found that 22% (29/129) resolved, 42% of patients had pyeloplasty (54/129) and 36% had persistent HN that required follow-up (46/129). Univariate predictors of resolution were age≥3 months at time of renal scan (p = 0.05), T ½ time≤5 min (p = 0.09), SFU grade 3 (p = 0.0009), and APD<20 mm (p = 0.005). Upon multivariable analysis, SFU grade 3 (OR = 4.14, 95% CI: 1.30-13.4, p = 0.02) and APD<20 mm (OR = 6.62, 95% CI: 1.41-31.0, p = 0.02) were significant predictors of resolution. In the analysis of decision for pyeloplasty, SFU grade 4 (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.01-5.71, p = 0.04) and T ½ time on subsequent renal scan of ≥20 min (OR = 5.14, 95% CI: 1.54-17.1, p = 0.008) were the significant predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with high grade HN and reassuring renal scan can pose a significant challenge to clinical management. Our results help identify a specific candidate for observation with little risk for progression: the patient with SFU grade 3, APD under 20 mm, T ½ of 5 min or less who was 3 months or older at the time of renal scan. However, many patients may progress to surgery or do not fully resolve and require continued follow-up.
