Home
Scholarly Works
Overlap of fractional cloud for radiation...
Journal article

Overlap of fractional cloud for radiation calculations in GCMs: A global analysis using CloudSat and CALIPSO data

Abstract

Assumptions made by global climate models (GCMs) regarding vertical overlap of fractional amounts of clouds have significant impacts on simulated radiation budgets. A global survey of fractional cloud overlap properties was performed using 2 months of cloud mask data derived from CloudSat‐CALIPSO satellite measurements. Cloud overlap was diagnosed as a combination of maximum and random overlap and characterized by vertically constant decorrelation length cf * . Typically, clouds overlap between maximum and random with smallest cf * (medians → 0 km) associated with small total cloud amounts , while the largest cf * (medians ∼3 km) tend to occur at near 0.7. Global median cf * is ∼2 km with a slight tendency for largest values in the tropics and polar regions during winter. By crudely excising near‐surface precipitation from cloud mask data, cf * were reduced by typically <1 km. Median values of cf * when Sun is down exceed those when Sun is up by almost 1 km when cloud masks are based on radar and lidar data; use of radar only shows minimal diurnal variation but significantly larger cf * . This suggests that sunup inferences of cf * might be biased low by solar noise in lidar data. Cloud mask cross‐section lengths L of 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 km were considered. Distributions of cf * are mildly sensitive to L thus suggesting the convenient possibility that a GCM parametrization of cf * might be resolution‐independent over a wide range of resolutions. Simple parametrization of cf * might be possible if excessive random noise in , and hence radiative fluxes, can be tolerated. Using just cloud mask data and assuming a global mean shortwave cloud radiative effect of −45 W m −2 , top of atmosphere shortwave radiative sensitivity to cf * was estimated at 2 to 3 W m −2 km −1 .

Authors

Barker HW

Journal

Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 113, No. D8,

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Publication Date

April 27, 2008

DOI

10.1029/2007jd009677

ISSN

0148-0227

Labels

Sustainable Development Goals (SDG)

Contact the Experts team