Home
Scholarly Works
Comparison between measured and modelled...
Journal article

Comparison between measured and modelled cloudless‐sky solar irradiances at the surface and at the top of the atmosphere

Abstract

Cloudless‐sky solar fluxes calculated by the radiative transfer algorithm used in the Canadian Climate Centre's general circulation climate model are compared with measurements of upwelling radiation at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) and downwelling radiation at the surface. The 12‐layer model partitions the solar spectrum into two broad wavebands (0.25–0.68 and 0.68–4.00 μm). The comparison utilized TOA fluxes estimated from Nimbus‐ 7 measurements and measured downwelling fluxes at the surface for Kalgoorlie, West Australia, and downwelling fluxes at the surface for Woodbridge, Ontario. Model estimates and measurements agreed to within experimental error for most solar zenith angles. Estimates improved, especially at Woodbridge, when aerosol effects were included. The mean bias error was less than 4% for surface irradiance and less than 6% for upwelling TOA irradiance, which produces a TOA albedo error of about 0.01.

Authors

Barker HW; Davies JA

Journal

Atmosphere-Ocean, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp. 716–727

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Publication Date

December 1, 1989

DOI

10.1080/07055900.1989.9649363

ISSN

0705-5900

Contact the Experts team